Maty Bohacek

I am a researcher at Stanford University working with Prof. Maneesh Agrawala. I work at the intersection of AI and media integrity. In a world that is becoming increasingly AI-mediated, my goal is to build AI systems and networks that are inherently trustworthy and interpretable, resulting in productive, democratic discourse.

Maty BohacekMaty Bohacek - alternate

Research Interests

AI Mediation & Communication Integrity

More of our transactions are produced or mediated by AI every day: personal conversations, news, payments, even creative work. I aim to develop methods to understand these phenomena and help individuals retain their own agency.

We demonstrated the power of deepfakes by running a fake Anderson Cooper on primetime television (PNAS’23) and built detectors to protect world leaders against such threats (PNAS’22). We created the DeepSpeak dataset (CVPR’26), now licensed to 100+ academic institutions, and measured the prevalence and impact of AI on the web (preprint).

AI Alignment & Governance

Priorities and accountability for AI systems are set opaquely, by a select few; I seek ways of making those methods transparent and fundamentally democratic.

We maintain an Encyclopedia of existing alignment and governance methods, including an open-source package with their implementations. We outlined our vision for positive alignment, which goes beyond safety alignment (preprint), and showed that cascading features are better than classic contrastive pairs for steering and detection (preprint). I delivered a keynote at the AI Standards Summit in Seoul, co-organized by ISO, IEC, and ITU / UN.

AI Evaluation & Narratives

The state of AI evaluation feels more cluttered than ever, yet these evaluations keep being used to make sweeping claims that prop up grandiose narratives about AI systems. I seek evaluation methods grounded in interpretability, and a more accurate account of AI progress.

We built a method to uncover gaps in existing benchmarks and provide more granular insight thanks to interpretability (ICML’26), and showed that there are concepts AI models see at training but cannot generate (ICLR’26). We evaluated patterns in AI evaluation and the narratives built around them (FAccT’26). With Evan Ratliff, I co-created the Shell Game podcast, where we put some of those narratives about AI agents to test.

Recent News

All News →

AI Governance Workshop at CASBS

One paper at FAccT

Princeton/NYU Panel

One paper and workshop organization at CVPR

Upcoming

No upcoming events.

Whether you are a researcher exploring collaboration ideas, a journalist writing about AI, a policymaker seeking insight, or an educator looking to apply AI in new ways — I would love to hear from you at maty@stanford.edu.